Definition: Now of the things which we have spoken [this is] the sum: We have such an high priest, who is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens;
Explanation: Okay, let's break down this verse from Hebrews 8:1. It’s a really interesting and somewhat mysterious passage that sets up a key concept about how God’s presence and authority works in the Old Testament. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: Think of it like this: “We have spoken…” – This refers to the Old Testament laws, stories, and prophecies that God gave to Moses. It's essentially a message from God about how things should be. “…this is” – This means we’re explaining something more important. “We have such an high priest…” – This is the crucial part! The verse introduces a new kind of high priest. What's a High Priest? Traditionally, priests in Jewish law played a very important role. They were intermediaries between God and the people. They offered sacrifices to be accepted by God and were seen as a representative of God on Earth. Now, here’s what Hebrews 8:1 says: “Set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens” – This is where it gets really special. The “Throne of the Majesty” isn't just a physical seat; it represents God’s authority and position in heaven . It means God is actively involved in and overseeing everything. The “right hand” part suggests that God is directly controlling and directing all things. So, what does this mean? Hebrews 8:1 says that the Old Testament system of priests wasn't just a symbolic role – it was actually a direct connection to God. God isn’t using priests, but rather is the high priest in Heaven. This suggests God is actively involved and overseeing everything, not just through intermediaries, but directly! In short: The Old Testament system of priests was a way for people to get close to God, but this verse describes a higher level of relationship where God is directly present and controlling the entire process. Important Note: This is a complex concept that’s debated among theologians. It's often interpreted as suggesting a more personal and active role for God than simply having intermediaries. --- Do you want me to: Explain this verse in more detail? Connect it to a specific biblical story or figure?